Wednesday, December 31, 2014

"And there is no question that the patient was harmed by being given only a maintenance dose of a blinded medication for six months with no apparent response to the treatment."

"So Dan was involuntarily committed to a treatment plan that would never have been suggested for him had it not been part of a clinical trial protocol to study maintenance medication. As he had never really responded, there was nothing to maintain. And one can hardly claim that his one doctor’s visit per month is anything like the necessary vigilance."

Dr. Mickey Nardo weighs in again on the unnecessary death of Dan Markingson.

No comments:

Post a Comment