Psychiatrist Mickey Nardo writes:
"It’s the lack of engagement of Dan that haunts me in this story – from
AstraZeneca, to Dr. Olson, to the clinical coordinator, to the
university – or the implication that his mother was being a royal pain,
or that she had something to do with his suicide, or that Judy Stone was
a "whacko," or that Carl Elliot doesn’t deserve to be listened to, or even that "it’s a tragedy, not a scandal."
Who was engaged with Dan – the young man who was living among
telepaths, mind readers, and hybrids, absent emotional attachments?"
You can read the entirety of this excellent post here.